>>111382963Isn't really breaking news, this is a good rundown from September 4th
https://youtu.be/Dnq6qsz2Io0?t=9m44s (fourth story or something, starts at 9:44)
And the 'Fish in a Barrel' clip is covered in his video the day after
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFzizT0kXv0Notably, this has received an update where the FTC overall sounds a little more open to change and extending the comment period.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_S81NoYZ3M (only the first six minute)
Sorry for shilling this guy so much, I just don't know anyone else that's talked about this.
>>111383717Two issues, A) Kids content was one of the biggest money making machines on youtube for the longest time, marking your videos as 'not kid friendly' can and will turn off a lot of potential advertising moneys. And, B) if you don't mark your stuff as 'non-child friendly' and someone else does, you can fines fatter than your head, and as it stands, what counts as 'child-directed/child-friendly' content isn't well defined. If you're a mildly entertaining thirty year old man that just plays Minecraft without swearing, maybe you're not doing it for kids, but there's gonna be a good amount of kids watching you.
>>111384356$42K Per video. Considering there's barely any successful channel with less than 100 videos, that's more money that most have lying around.
