>>111039394You have no reasonable counter-arguments, so you spew ad hominem, presumably laced with a good helping of projection.
Even if I am "weak" under whatever definition your prescribe to that word, it doesn't change the nature of my argument. If I am weak, it doesn't change the fact that we don't live in a magic post-scarcity world. It doesn't change the fact that you need to compete in order to thrive, and this will likely never change.
So I'm not sure what you're hoping to accomplish with this.
