>>110990621>It's not your problemGood we’re getting somewhere
>but it is a factor when you just scream you want high quality stuff like this without understanding why that was able to be made to begin with and why it is no longer made now.Of course I understand the decision. Fan backlash was determined less costly than the production of quality products. My purpose is to make it more costly.
>There is a difference between demanding an entertaining cartoon and demanding that a cartoon be just like Batman: The Animated Series and if it doesn't have that art or animation style, then it's not worth investing in.That is *technically* true, there is a difference, but it isn’t a binary choice. You can have both or neither. You’ve also wormed your way into another strawman, demanding quality and providing an example in BTAS is NOT the same as saying all cartoons need to look like BTAS.
>If you refuse to understand why things have gotten to this pointBut I do, it’s just irrelevant to me as a consumer.
>and just want to say stupid things like, "They took a chance before"There is nothing stupid about pointing out that they could if they wanted to.
>then you'll always be unhappy because it's not "muh Gargoyles".Of course, I will be unhappy unless a proper product is provided for me. Putting muh in front of something is not an argument.
