>>110572130Well, as it is, it's nothing. It's not a joke, except to people who already agree with the ideaology, and even then it's less of a joke, and more confirmation.
And secondly, it's just a weak strawman to begin with since nobody in the history of ever made that argument.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is, since it's already not a joke, I do think it'd be improved by being at least truthful.
