>>110384426>>110384527>>110384583>>110385257>>110385754>>110385992>>110385997>>110386152>>110386654>>110387132>>110387395>>110387919The problem that I see is that
1) They were entirely too focused on Inma, the main giantess, and how much focus she'd have in the story. There was no thought put into Jack's part, the deuteragonist, or his role in his story. As far as I could see from the storyboard, Jack was meant to be a punching bag and a pussy.
Sure it can be fine for laughs in the beginning, but if he is emasculated for the whole movie then that sets a bad message for a movie that females can bully males without repercussion.
What they could have done is spend the first half of the film or movie expanding on jack's life and character being a human being on land. It could show his work ethic, how he lives in poverty, and how he is a hard worker who doesn't give up despite adversity.
They could then swap to Inma being a rude, mean, and headstrong which is why she is isolated and why many of the other giantesses her age avoid her and treat her like an outcast.
Then it would actually make sense when she finds Jack who actually treats her like a friend and not some weirdo like how lilo was treated in lilo and stitch.
2) the number of antagonists. As far as I can see, there were about 5 villains or antagonists in the film. How they were going to defeat all 5 villains in one movie as well as expand on Jack and Inma's characters is beyond me.
The little mermaid had 1 main antagonist
Moana had a main antagonist and side antagonist "Timatoa or whatever"
Tangled had rapunzel's mother and the two smaller guys that hated flint.
Multiple big time villians do not work in a film. The protagonists both need to have a common enemy. The enemy of the main antagonist does not make the enemy of the secondary antagonist unless the goals line up.
Incoming part 2
