>>110105210If you understand ALL of the pop culture references (movies, actors, politicians, music, plays, news items, books), you're probably autistic. I have never even seen Halloween and I knew who the fuck the masked guy was in the TTA movie.
That said, I found The Looney Tunes Show hilarious most of the time compared to TTA or Animaniacs. The first episode was great. Making it like Daffy was a stalker of Bugs because he was in love with him or some shit. Also the joke about them being gay due to them being handcuffed together.
>>110104789Fund it. His universe was intriguing. Almost moreso than the actual universe with the school.
>>110106114>1990I think it came out in 1993. Don't quote me on that. I'm going by memory. I had two or three coloring books. Two LT and one TTA. I forgot about those pictures until the one user posted them.
>>110106235>>110106305Makes sense. Maybe it's because of Spielberg? Why the fuck was he even involved whenever he was never truly involved. I think they did it just so they could shove in as many parodies of his movies as they possibly could. Did he ever even fucking contribute anything to the series or was he just a rubber stamp for the parodies? I thought The Warner Brothers (& Dot) were rehashes of Foxy and Roxy (another fucking TTA episode talked about them, unless Foxy and Roxy were parodies of Wakko, Yakko & Dot).
>>110106955>>110107189>>110111851The Looney Tunes Show was TV-PG, oddly, so they were ...vaguely more edgy compared to older shorts, but not enough for a TV-14 rating. One episode had Porky with Stockholm Syndrome or some shit. It was wild.Plus the aforementioned episode with Lola seducing Daffy in a short scene reminiscent of The Graduate with the older woman showing her leg to the younger man. She thought Daffy was in love with her and I forgot why. It was hilarious and strange.
