>>109716406Oh. Yeah the faggot gets a bit dramatic a bit into it, but honestly thats par for the course when you find shit people are passionate about so I let it slide so long as its not just repeating the same thing or blind stubbornness.
To me, its right. Real libertarianism would require a massive culture change and measures taken to ensure that culture remained the same as to upeep libertarianism... which itself if kinda a violation of it.
mega-corps will monopolize and undercut competition even if all lobbying / political attachments were removed.
Internationalists will still ship away jobs to chinklands for slave labor only to ship the product back here for a massive profit.
Libertarianism is a good idea but unrealistic. Companys NEED a limit or a cap. something to stop monopolies. internationalists, and to let actual competition exist!
The 'free market' america loves was in hindsight, a large open pasture. It still had a limiting fence, not like the open field we have now.
Look up the law that Morgan and Rockefeller lobbied like mad to remove. I dont remember the name in my tipsy state, but it was bacisally to open or expand your business you had to go to a local court to make a case on why it would be beneficial to the community before you got approval to do so. 9/10 times, a technicality. Jobs and wages are good. But it did stop alot of shady shit from happening. Actually made people accountable for their actions.