>>109123972>I'd hardly call it mutilation even.
It's cutting off part of someone's sexual organs when they are helpless and unable to consent. Is FGM not mutilation either? >It may have had some negative effects on some people, but it's not like it always fucks up people who had it done to them
It has negative effects on every single person that had it done, they lose hundreds of nerve endings and have permanently scared genitalia. Why not cut the tips of baby's noses off too? What's wrong with that? What about melting a baby's face when they are born, but make sure it heals back without infection. No harm done, right? They just have a disfigured face. What's wrong with that, right?>since the only people who make it a serious habit are Jews
Retarded American zioboomer christians do it as well, muslims as well.