>>108662766"classical" music is a designation for a very specific period in western music that's long since passed and that they can't then be apart of. to be a "classic" is altogether different. confusing the two demonstrates ignorance on part of the creator or the reader, whichever is applicable here since you didn't mention the book
>>108662938this better be bait
tupac, nwa and the like will stand the test of time because they had substance, as social commentary, if nothing else - in essence, they produced art. gucci gang and lil pump are strictly kitsch, they have nothing to say. and aside from pairing a song of theirs with a memorable to-be-retro dance, nobody is going to know those names in 100 years
>>108663937prehistoric is also a very precise time period, but this is a more accurate sentiment. algorithms and computers have been changing the way music is produced and the way it sounds for decades and will likely continue to do so as the technology becomes cheaper and more accessible. that we're becoming more and more global and multicultural, that we're no longer connected to physically producing sound and that the formal rules of western music are increasingly less important to production as technology becomes more accessible to people without any training or skill in playing an instrument, and soon with the wide advent of algorithmic "ai" composition software, the music we listen could be radically different in many ways, eventually justiftying an altogether new paradigm
in some ways pop music will always be pop music. it's purpose isn't appreciation, it's to dance to. it's constrained for that reason to relatively simple time signatures, and though we may become more articulate polyrhythmic dancers in the future, to be widely appealing and easy to follow, pop music would be slow to follow. it can be all other sorts of weird, but the whole point is that anybody can tap their foot to it
>>108663979Lick Me In The Ass. also Lick My Ass Nice and Clean
