>>107679902>Richard the Third is a villain.
Richard III was the rightful king of England and, despite political wrangling to screw his nephew via a technicality, did not have a particularly bad reign. Despite accusations of murder, no reliable evidence was ever found.
Henry VII usurped his rule, and was well known for being a tight fisted miser. By your logic this makes him a villain and Richard the defeated hero of a tragic story.
Just stop talking about things you know nothing about, and instead use other arguments for why Viren's actions are villainous.
This should not be difficult.