>>106412038This is almost entirely bait, but let's discredit it.
>Manufactured weapons for the US Government for a decade, only stopping to reconsider his morality after the public opposition rose to the Vietnam warThat's actually the real world reason he stopped, in the comics, as in the MCU, it was seeing his weapons were falling into the hands of other regimes and terrorists, not that he found something inherently wrong with arming his own nation's military.
>Drove his rival, Obadiah Stane, into committing suicideHe defeated Stane in a fight, Stane killed himself to avoid being exposed as a criminal, being disgraced, going to prison and probably getting raped.
>Killed Titanium Man because he was using Stark technologyActually an accidental death, not an intentional murder.
>Losing control of his armor, he killed his girlfriend, the Stark industries board...Murders performed by someone else wearing a stolen Iron Man armor
>...Yellowjacket...and two womenHe hadn't lost control of his armor, he was being controlled by Kang or by Immortus, depending on retcons.
Most of the issue references for this one were wrong, too.
>Built a super computer to predict crime and stop it before it happened, only to deem the same actions as anti-ethical during the second Civil WarTony used his computer to get superheroes in place to try and stop villains, wars, and alien invasions. Carol used her Inhuman for arresting and imprisoning civilians because of a prediction that they would commit a crime. These things aren't equivalent.
>Created the Illuminati, a secret cabal which made decisions on behalf of the worldHe didn't do that on his own, there were six of them.
>Attacked the Skrulls in an act of warSkrulls have been attacking Earth since before the Silver Age, but retaliating was "an act of war"?
>Took responsibility for the unstable Sentry, who ended up losing his sanity and killing AresThis is ignoring Norman Osborn's influence over Sentry.
