>>105449260While I agree with you on that, the problem is that you missed the point of that last panel, it shows not a dam, being broken, but the moment the rupture point is reached, and everything turns to chaos. In that, the confusion and business were the obvious objective.
Nonsense is a semantic possibility, don't confuse lack of clarity for lack of meaning
Also
>>105449517I found a common mistake both here and on /ic/ is to apply cinematographic esthetics to comic books, take those as a guide ; while it's a cultural thing : cape comics proeminently use cinematographic codes for example, but there's a lot more to comics, just see Brecht Evens, Druillet, or simply older arts like illuminations.
Maybe it's something like that that occured, wrong system of interpretation ?
