>>104815618The artist is female so there's an extremely high threshold of what it'd take for Marvel to grow big enough balls to criticize her, or any other female creator, for anything, ever, especially not publicly once the work was released.
Also the art here is fucking beautiful in a way that's not gratuitous in any way. It's a woman with very little covering her, but it's not typical standard comic booky pseudo-pr0n.
Sana Takeda is fucking incredible.
A better question would be:
If a male artist did this, would Marvel allow it?
Or would Twitter be spazzing out and getting the cover banned? I think they would be. They'd be calling the same exact cover "sexist" if a male artist created it.
But I don't think Marvel 2018 would allow a male artist to draw something like this for fear of ignorant reprisal.
>>104816204They care when it fits the typical narrative.
They care when J Scott Campbell goes a little too "sexy" with a black teenager.