I was away from the computer. Man, I got a lot of replies.
>>104784330Until a person commits oppression, subjugation, you have no right to use force against them, and when you do, it must be in self-defense only. You idiot. These are some of the most basic laws of our society.
>>104784403I don't. Nice projection.
>>104784419You're not me, but I'd say the same thing.
>>104784412James Fields killed someone, so everyone else who was at the event deserved to have their rights violated? Fuck off.
>>104784500I know they chanted that shit, what's your point? They still have their rights.
>It's ok to hate Nazis, they're basically as close to true evil as you can get.I agree. I can hate someone without violating their rights, because rights are important.
>Plus like, it's not oppression to want to stop nazis because they want to kill you and other non-whites or your non-white-straight friends or family.The literal definition of oppression is the violation of someone's rights. It's not oppression to "want to stop Nazis," it is oppression to violently attack someone who is exercising their rights. You idiot.
>>104784616Someone who is for acceptance advocates the use of violence to silence people in what is supposed to be a liberal democracy? That's hypocritical as fuck. It shows this person isn't for human rights, they're for THEIR own rights and the oppression of those who aren't in their group.
>>104784622Many Nazis, actually. Doesn't matter. They are American citizens with rights. If you think that your vehement disagreement with someone entitles you to oppress them, then you're a piece of shit, and if you think YOU get to claim you're fighting on the behalf of the oppressed after doing that, you're a hypocrite.
>>104784655>He drew it on the day a Nazi killed somebody.It is true a Nazi killed someone that day, but there was, as President Drumpf said, violence on many sides. The police stood down and that's why a riot happened.
