>>104739354It’s not. I can see why it’d appeal to furries, but not every cartoon with anthropomorphic animals is automatically furry content, and defending a cartoon doesn’t mean you want to fuck the characters in it anyway, meaning the people arguing with you don’t necessarily need to be furries. You know that. I know you’ve mentioned in these threads before to liking other cartoons that have anthropomorphic animal characters in them, I just can’t remember which ones specifically.
Furthermore it wouldn’t matter even if the people defending the movie were furries: their point is right anyway.