>>104185713Anarchists have defended freedom of speech for centuries now. This is important in principle: in an anarchist vision of society, neither the state nor any other entity should be able to determine what we can and cannot say. It's also important in practice: as a revolutionary minority frequently targeted for repression, we've consistently had our speeches, newspapers, websites, and marches attacked.
But we aren't the only ones who have taken up the banner of free speech. More recently, the right wing in the US has begun to allege that a supposed failure to give conservative views an equal hearing alongside liberal views constitutes a suppression of their free speech. By accusing "liberal" universities and media of suppressing conservative views--a laughable assertion, given the massive structures of power and funding advancing those views--they use First Amendment discourse to promote reactionary agendas. Supposedly progressive campuses reveal their true colors as they mobilise institutional power to defend right-wing territory in the marketplace of ideas, going so far as to censor and intimidate opposition.
Extreme right and fascist organizations have jumped onto the free speech bandwagon as well. Fascists rely on the state to protect them, claiming that racist, anti-immigrant, and anti-gay organising constitutes a form of legally protected speech. Fascist groups that are prevented from publishing their material in most other industrialised democracies by laws restricting hate speech frequently publish it in the United States, where no such laws exist, and distribute it worldwide from here. In practice, state protection of the right to free expression aids fascist organising.
If defending free speech has come to mean sponsoring wealthy right-wing politicians and enabling fascist recruiting, it's time to scrutinise what is hidden behind this principle.
