>>103954097On the off chance you aren't trolling, I'll offer an explanation exactly once. This post does not require a reply because you wont get another one after this. Only someone trying to bait would reply to this post.
I said firebending doesnt cause convection, I didnt say that firebending wasnt hot. However, I did say that firebending doesnt work like real fire, it breaks physics because its fantasy whatever. Since its not real, it can still be hot without causing convection. Your constant insistence that I claimed it wasnt hot over a dozen posts is idiotic, this is I think the 5th or 6th time this has been pointed out to you, the fact that you keep bringing it up again and insisting that I'm claiming firebending isn't hot outs you as a baiter.
You ask what convection means. It's what a current of warmer air (the definition says fluids, to an engineer air can be a fluid, it's meant to apply to both liquids and gases.) is moved because of its temperature, creating a current. A convection current. This EFFECTIVELY transfers heat, but not literally. It's transferring hot air, it is not a form of thermal radiation. If convection occurs, then things near the heat source have very hot wind against them, burning them and causing a low pressure area which can make it hard to breathe, sometimes impossible. I brought up three examples, the Dragons fire tornado, which didnt suffocate those inside as it should have it convection was working. Also, Zukos duel with Azula, when near misses of huge amounts of fire left both completely unharmed, meaning convection was not occurring. Lastly, the multiple fights in an active volcano, which notoriously suffocate people within the caldera due to convection currents. When I said they don't generate convection, I mean they don't generate the currents that make up convection, which should be obvious to anyone who engages in good faith. You do not do so.
I will repeat: ONLY SOMEONE TRYING TO BAIT WOULD REPLY TO THIS POST.
