>>101579934So I take it you haven't seen a lot of Shadman.
>>101579964> muh it's just a drawingFine. Worst you can do without breaking the law.
However, if you're one of those fagots who thinks he can look at cartoon child porn and not have his view of real children affected, you're full of shit and can kindly go fuck yourself.
I've had friends who told me they were into cartoon child furry porn, but that they weren't into real children, and that I was small-minded for even wondering whether they might be. I'm sorry, but I just can't buy that.
Maybe future generations will call me a bigot for thinking this way, but I don't care. You wouldn't be interested in cartoon child porn unless you were at least a little bit interested in actual children.
