>>101331617>Believing you're not either genderSex =/= gender
Sex is what your body is.
Gender is what your mind is, and recently the concept has evolved as a social role.
And the thing about living in post-modernism is,
>If someone uses religion as a solution to metaphysical answersThis equation is reversed.
The common solution is to use metaphysical answers as a solution to try to define scientific or (or spiritual) answers to themselves.
I frankly find that kind of limiting and restrictive.
You're just making up words and trying to say something declarative about yourself, without intention of it meaning anything (scientifically/spiritually/physically) and that's shallow and vapid, and I consider it part of the natural human need for Identity and Social recognition; fundamentally flawed.
If someone says "I'm a transvestite and I'm happiest wearing clothes of the opposite sex", I can understand that.
That's easily defined and carries no metaphysical conceit. It's something you do, not what you are.
But if someone says "I'm a Demi-vestite Transbinary and is part woman, male, trans", well why is that necessary?
It's a concept without any ethical core, any religious belief or action taken, nor does it describe themselves well.
And then you're forced to conform to an idea you made up rather than an idea to progress your own personhood.
Look up the list of Non-binary genders; they don't mean anything and all regurgitate the same female/male paradigm.
>http://gender.wikia.com/wiki/Bigender>multigender>genderfluidAll the same thing and don't mean anything.
They have no substance to them and don't entail any way of being or feeling that would push a person's identity forward.
It's like someone wanted to quit Religion but was so subconsciously devoted they couldn't conceptualize not being religious, so they invented "Pan-Christian" and "Demi-Christian" as an attempt to reach towards emancipation without knowing how to do it.
