>>101313233>too deep for modern audiences to understand?No, it's just an overcomplicated thriller with many subplots that lead nowhere, there are like at least three movie worthy subplots that were crammed in a single movie, for example
>Superman is being incriminated by Lex Luthor as being too dangerous for the world, half of the population hates him or fear himthus Superman loses hope and acts like he doesn't have a place in the world anymore.
and
>Superman wants to stop and beat the shit out of Batman for being a violent vigilante and acts smug about it.See, Superman is behaving like two different characters in a single movie and he is ignoring Lex Luthor even exists for most of the plot just so the movie can focus on building up to the "battle" between him and Batman, that in the end is resolved in an unsatisfactory way, and it's not the "Martha" part that bothers me personally is that Lois Lane saves him and somehow she is able to pinpoint and move towards the exact location of the fight in like 5 minutes.
The only deep part of the movie is that at least tries to explore the consequeces of an alien like Superman existing in the "real world" but even that isn't something new, even the MCU movies like Civil War are more or less doing the same thing with their characters.
And there is performance that drags the movie down to the mud and is Eisenberg as Lex Luthor, Eisenberg didn't sold me the idea of Lex Luthor being an atheist Mark Zuckerberg with daddy issues and his mannerism and tics were ridiculous.
