>>100934031And if they keep pulling people into the carrier it will not have room or resources.
If you're going to try and focus on the analogy rather than the point I'll force it further.
The point will always remain, why? Because anon says it's "right"? Because "those poor poor people"? Because "they need us".
This comes back to control. You didn't answer to my assertion that you anons are likely anti-gun (tbf that was a diffeeent anon but who only reads replies meant directly for them other than autists and newfags?) There will never be a change to America even with the guns. Without them we're slaves. This country is balanced on governmental fear of the people.
>>100934091>There is no reason why America will be any different now that we are headed down this road.Police have drones and tanks. Police. Not just military. The government has better drones better tanks better guns and better armor.
There is no reason? Really? You're as delusional as it gets. And you pretty much confirmed you're anti-gun. "Violent means". That's laughable. I tell my gunfag friends all the time (I actually don't even own any frankly) "your guns don't mean shit beside collateral damage and bad press."
If a "legit" revolution ever broke out the "violence" would last a week before a swift response shut everyone up. Then the best we could hope for is a return to capitalism if it didn't lead to corporate abandonment of the US.
It will not change, you'd have to be stupid to think it could.
