No.100864040
ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>100864102 >>100864109 >>100864144 >>100864147 >>100864185 >>100864191 >>100864379 >>100864395 >>100864461 >>100866286 >>100867431 >>100871550 >>100871554 >>100871647 >>100872066 >>100872289 >>100872359 >>100872808 >>100873202 >>100873211 >>100874634 >>100874722 >>100874833 >>100875249 >>100876042 >>100882859 >>100885229 >>100886756 >>100887266 >>100893389 >>100893524 >>100897211 >>100898237 >>100899098 >>100901115 >>100904554 >>100904818 >>100906309 >>100912332 >>100912650 >>100917580
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U6qYX9Zc1Tc
>DUDE WHAT IF ARTHUR AND FRIENDS WERE MISERABLE ADULTS WHO HAD SEX SMOKED WEED AND HATED THEIR JOBS LMAO
Why do hack fraud millennials think this lazy, trite garbage is funny? You can't just take something wholesome, make it unwholesome and call it funny. It's barely faithful to the source material and thus also fails as a parody.
>DUDE WHAT IF ARTHUR AND FRIENDS WERE MISERABLE ADULTS WHO HAD SEX SMOKED WEED AND HATED THEIR JOBS LMAO
Why do hack fraud millennials think this lazy, trite garbage is funny? You can't just take something wholesome, make it unwholesome and call it funny. It's barely faithful to the source material and thus also fails as a parody.
