actually I was talking about the spanish, and how big of cunts them and their little fucking offshoot nation were.
Arabs factored into it because i've had arab people talk about there being no white slave trade.
either way both groups were prolific slavers >>52839743
I doubt that eunuchs and disarmed slaves were as notable
The turks are weird folks, in that they decided to enslave their fighting force.>>52839840
from what i remember that was also mildly true of anglo slavery. >People forget that American chattel slavery was pretty much the only system that enslaved people specifically on the basis of race.
i mean i would have assumed the helots, and other defeated ethnic groups across the globe who were pressed into slavery on the basis of their race.
The anglos were simply had the unique position of needing to justifying this position.
it's better than island slavery 10 where you had a massive slave turn over rate which is why i was smacking the Spaniards.>>52839842
Arabs are still enslaving now
qatar built a museum to slavery with migrant workers who have had their visas taken away and are forced to work unlawful, effectively slaves
if you mean economically then probably not, the Spaniards had more colonial interest than the anglos, and generally consumed human life at an alarming rate.>>52839942>You know that in the Middle East black male slaves were routinely castrated and about 1/6 of them didn't survive this procedure, right?
It's likely more apologia for Islam.