>>50491698>Holy shit does the word gender role really trigger you that much
not the word anon, the idea or lack of support for these claims that angers me so greatly and the frankly stupid amount of protection the social so called sciences get to spread this bullshit around.
I've heard lectures where people will indicate the flaws in their theories and never address them, ducking out to speak as iff there is no need to back that shit up.
Worst of all they have this SMUG air about them deflecting questions on their methods and if someone really pisses them of destroying their jobs (in the case of a friend of mine and his wife, he's personae non grata at his university and lucky to still a job there).
all of this constructionist neo marxist shit.
it does more then stink.
it's in our universities 200%
It's in my countries primary schools.
it's fucking everywhere and i'm sick to death of it.>or that traditional roles are bad,
you indicated that it was common of /pol/ and pol = bad, the assumption was not a right one but it wasn't without merit.>Also I can't tell if you are pro or anti /pol/.
people tend to be more diverse than that.
I'm a former Leninist and i'm not white if that helps make your mind up
one can hate the atrophy of liberal intellectualism into the inbred aristocracy of Marxist thought it is now without being /pol/ or any type of idiot for that matter