>>66953711>It's not like there is any first party source that says "Eldar all have big fat tats".
No and that's not the point of why I pointed it out. You repeatedly refused depictions that go against what you think is correct because it's from third party sources. Those are from thirdy party sources.> Pretty wide shoulders, but nowhere near the massive muscles of the DELdar from that comic.
Probably because it's the difference between a man and woman. But the supposed androgyny of the eldar is also wildly inconsistent in its portrayal. >Now I think you are arguing in bad faith.
Yes Noldor, because over multiple threads where you've screeched them into ruin there just seems to be no point in taking you in good faith.>Can't even think of one.
I posted one in the post you're replying too, but here's another and >>66952184
for good measure >Anon, you asked me for my taste about that particular picture.
In the context of pointing out that eldar in official depictions have a broader variety of body type than what is you preferred taste.>I already stated in this thread how inconsistent the art is.
And you've been arguing in the thread as if it's consistent.