>>63488498That's how assimilation works.
An Englishman doesn't come to America wanting to set up a monarchy, he comes to America because he believes in American governance. Similarly the Founding Fathers figured that the American way of life included settling in cities, and using stuff like the printing press (and it wasn't like there weren't some parts of the indian livelihood that sucked, not being able to produce enough guns bit them in the ass). Besides, if you believe in a system, you want others to use it. If you don't want other people to act American (or perhaps to act WHITE in your case) then it seems you don't actually believe in those values.
Jackson disregarded the rule of law. The rule of law is the foundation of Western Society, all the way back to Hamurabi's code. He was an asshole who decided that he could pick and chose when he did his job.
Yeah. We have black people in government today. This is factual. And the country didn't catch on fire, until the black guy left the white house.
>Allied StalinIs this the part where you try to convince me you're not a Nazi?
>>63488530The Rome comparison is the most apt- Rome had an enormous economy that would fit every element that you'd want an American economy to.
>>63488539That doesn't answer the question as to whether Slavs are white.
>>63488610Not everything is a zero-sum game sir. A black man benefiting does not mean that a white man loses. Making everything a competition makes enemies out of potential allies, and creates conflict where there could instead be peace.
Don't believe me? Why don't whites compete with whites? Oh wait they do, that's what class is. Unless you want to tell me that if a white communist wins a workers rights case, then it is a necessary loss for the white capitalist. Which if it is, means that race isn't the sole factor in regards to societal conflict.
