>>9739198I realize that I'm going to need to beat this point over your head before you get it.
>You could post resources like 3B1B, which intentionally aim to cultivate said level of understanding. Or recommend books like Spivak (among others such as Apostol and Courant), that leave the reader with no other choice but to rigorously and intuitively understand the subject.
These are EXTRINSIC. Cultivation of knowledge and understanding is not an intrinsic understanding, it is a LEARNED (i.e. not from within) understanding, which means that it comes from a source which inherently implies outside (extrinsic) knowledge.
Intuitively understanding something merely means that you are aligning what you already intrinsically understand with knowledge that allows you to express this to others by explaining the objective constants.
Intrinsic understanding has nothing to do with that, and you are going off because you literally have no (ironically) intrinsic understanding of the phrase itself. OP is posing literally 'I wish I had a framework by which to integrate knowledge', and you are responding with "DURR JUST INTEGRATE THE KNOWLEDGE" and "WOW DONT GIVE HIM A FRAMEWORK"
Cherry on top?
>Your post did not display an instrinisic understanding.> It displayed only familiarity with the common definitions and descriptions of the word.Yeah that's what that is you fuckshit.
