>>9526082>It's an after the fact cleanup of 30's ideas.Except it isn't. Kontsevich invariants were developed purely from the affine algebra structure of CFTs and are completely independent of physical wankery. The fact that it lays the groundwork for Feynman diagrams speaks volumes for future developments in QFTs and EFTs; not that I expect you to understand why.
>They are not tangle as long as they are used for one of the thousand theories that are mere candidates for describing physics. >one>when I've literally listed an entire continuum of physical theories that topological field theories can reduce toDo you even know how to read? Single digit IQ retard.
>mere candidatesExcept quantum Hall effect is a well-tested well-documented and experimentally observed to be described perfectly with Laughlin wavefunctions, which are groundstates of a topological CFT.
>general relativityWhich Minkowski had no part in. Grossmann was the one who developed GR for Einstein.
The part of the priority dispute that is directly related to Minkowski only concerns SR.
>I'm not an undergrad, or even a grad student, anymore, and being afraid of embarrasing yourself is a spook :^) Oh so you're an even worse case of Dunning-Kruger. Why are you even on this board?
>Why are you so angry, don't through around insults like that.Save the hurt feelings for when your IQ matures to at least 75, dumbass.
>reddit spacing>typos everywhereCan you be more incredulous? It's hilarious how other impressionable retards on this site actually listen to your dribble.
Now if you'll excuse me from your retardation I need to catch a flight to a workshop. Don't ever reply to me ever again.
