>>9020712>Maybe you all should discuss why its not possible?There's not exactly a lot to discuss: It directly and strongly violates well-established physics.
>Over unity and zero point ate 100 percent theoretically possible.No.
>>9020754>It is more likely that a it exists than does not exists considering the physics."The physics" pretty clearly lays out that energy is a conserved quantity. That directly rules out half of all "over unity" machines, regardless of what principles they work on.
>You would not be creating free energy, you would be drawing from a limitless supply contained within space itself. Which also isn't permitted, unless you expend more energy than you extract. That's the other half ruled out.
>See recent developments in dark energy and particle research.Can you at least point to WHICH developments? Do you even know of any?
>My point is the rabbit hole is getting deeper and wider and exponentially more extraordinary by the day.It's clear you don't actually HAVE a point. You're just typing science-words and hoping it convinces everyone your brand of magic exists.
>My point is...its not IMPOSSIBLE.It's impossible.
