>>11209084either way, being able to be a non-autist and have children is what sexually reproducing earth organisms do for a living.
Unless autist incels invent a new form of reproduction possible, then they are the definition of being dysgenic, and substantially inferior.
I am not sure whether humans are really monogamous or promiscuous, but as long as it works.
Orangutans have interesting mating habits.
technically they are promiscuous and don't form long term bonding pairs, however, they have a very strong mother-child relationship, caring for their young for a few years, and not ovulating during that time. The males will call out for the females, who if females will seek the males.
Gorillas are also technically promiscuous, however, the strongest gorilla tends to be the only one that gets to mate, forming something similar to an elephant seal harem.
A gorilla is required to be very large in order to compete for the most females. Their size is purely for the benefit of interspecies combat.
Chimps are very promiscuous too, they have a male hierarchy, and are sexually dominant over females.
The alpha chimp, will often be more intelligent and powerful than all the other chimps (therefore having the best sexual fitness).
Chimps hate other chimps that aren't part of their tribe, they will fight foreign males.
The alpha chimp has the power and authority to mate with the best and most female, but they are all sex psychopaths.
Chimp females also tend to have a few years of infertility during child rearing. Male chimps will kill infant chimps that they don't believe is their own, and female chimps will kill other female's infant, for whatever fucked up reason.
I make the hypothesis that humans probably have a similar mating habits as chimps, except after finding a partner (through hypergamy) they will tend to pair bond to ensure productive reproduction, since chimps have so much distrust they will kill their young.