>>10762619>For now, but you could potentially get a denser machine then a comparable solid-state chip especially if the amount of usable states is limitless.You can fit multiple transistors across a bacterium. Second, even if they were denser there's no point. Because they're just chemicals bumping around, computation proceeds at the speed of chemicals bumping around. This is slow relative to the speeds at which transistors switch. But let's say that we have fucking magic that enables your bumping chemicals to work really fast. Well, Von Neumann and Landauer tell us that deleting information must expend energy, which gets turned into heat. This means that our hypothetical biocomputer could cook itself. And then there's also the fact that chemicals randomly bumping around are noisy, meaning that we may have to waste a fair amount computation on correcting errors.
>whatever task the DNA instructs the machine to dono faggot, what the fuck are the bacteria doing infecting your body? Also why the FUCK would you purposely inject bacteria into your blood stream. That will most certainly cause an immune reaction