/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #10669378

83KiB, 650x650, 1551159641723.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

10^-43 seconds

Anonymous Fri 24 May 18:16:37 2019 No.10669378 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>10669387 >>10669714 >>10669724 >>10670306 >>10670312 >>10670774 >>10670837 >>10671274

>The Planck time is the time it would take a photon travelling at the speed of light to across a distance equal to the Planck length. This is the 'quantum of time', the smallest measurement of time that has any meaning, and is equal to 10-43 seconds. No smaller division of time has any meaning.
Dang...

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 32c.png, 578KiB, 1116x1100

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 18:19:08 No.10669387 Report

Quoted By: >>10670740 >>10670841 >>10671301

>>10669378
>No smaller division of time has any meaning.
Pfffffffffttttttttttttttttttttttt get on my level timelet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 20:05:38 No.10669663 Report

Quoted By: >>10669695 >>10669723 >>10670300

>no smaller division of time has any meaning

“Half the Planck time” is a meaningful phrase

stupid science bitches BTFO

No but seriously though what is meant by the word “meaning” in this context?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 20:16:41 No.10669695 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669663
Presumably it means nothing could actually occur at timescales smaller than that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 20:24:29 No.10669714 Report

Quoted By: >>10670819

>>10669378
Space-time is notquantized at the Planck scale.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 20:26:54 No.10669723 Report

Quoted By: >>10670770

>>10669663
>"I walked backwards in time"
Does this make time travel possible?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1546717723333.jpg, 24KiB, 540x540

Anonymous Fri 24 May 2019 20:26:54 No.10669724 Report

Quoted By: >>10670828

>>10669378

Do you mean that there are more degrees of freedom for light to move in NOW than in every single moment from the big band to now?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 00:50:23 No.10670300 Report

Quoted By: >>10671256

>>10669663
Assume it's to do with quantised foamy spacetime. In theory Planck units are on the same scale as quantum uncertainty/fluctuations so half a Planck time passing is statistically indistinguishable to no time passing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 00:53:02 No.10670306 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669378
Schizophrenics have wild imaginations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 00:55:22 No.10670312 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669378
The planck scale isn't a "pixel size of the universe," it's just the size where quantum gravity starts being relevant and you need it to figure out what would happen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 04:40:22 No.10670740 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669387
Attosecond 10-18
Plank 10-43

What?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO plancklength.png, 140KiB, 500x499

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:02:48 No.10670754 Report

Quoted By: >>10671364

I'm confused

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:12:39 No.10670770 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669723
It doesn't MAKE time travel possible, but time travel must be possible for that statement to be made, since the person you quoted never lies. I know this because he told me so.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:13:59 No.10670774 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669378
I am 100% confident that this statement was not written by a working physicist, and definitely not by one working on quantum gravity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:35:43 No.10670819 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669714
Based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:40:41 No.10670828 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669724
No, that's not what the image says. Read it again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:45:37 No.10670837 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669378
If the geometry of space can be changed, that means space can be stretched and compressed. If we compress space, the planck length becomes smaller also. Czechmate, gaytheists.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 05:48:30 No.10670841 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669387
>If you could perceive the world in that speed, even light would appear frozen to you
wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 11:18:55 No.10671256 Report

Quoted By:

>>10670300
>statistically
exactly, it's a fuckin artifact of not having a complete theory

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 11:34:44 No.10671274 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669378
Planck time is not real. It is merely a mathematical thought.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 3088.jpg, 20KiB, 695x371

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 11:50:50 No.10671301 Report

Quoted By:

>>10669387

>atto
>otto
>airplane
>atta
>911

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 May 2019 12:22:41 No.10671364 Report

Quoted By:

>>10670754
science-cucks btfo, never ever been in a hardware store

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches