>>10668769>>what is the Schrodinger equation, exactly?>video demonstrates her clear undergrad 1 semester of QM understanding of the subjectNot to single her out, as there are many channels like this, but I'll never understand people who make these kinds of videos. There's so much subtlety and nuance to these topics that if you haven't been working in the field for decades, there's just stuff you're going to miss or misinterpret. How can you put a video on the internet for potentially hundreds of thousands of people to watch and listen to your superficial understanding of the material?
This is why I pretty much only watch Brady's channels for my popsci hit, because at least everyone on there is a working professor or some equivalent of that (well except for some of the Numberphile people, but even James has a PhD).