>>10668468>in a way that allows them to control the actions of the otherNo, because people who work for the government lose their status as people. They declare their allegiance to a system, and automatically become bonded to law. Their actions are not controlled by the president, they simply willingly act on the word of whatever fool has been elected.
>justice refers to moralsThat's your (politically motivated) interpretation. It isn't like that for everyone, not by a long shot. You give nothing to go on for what's right or wrong, which only results in every nation, every culture, having their own standards.
>Do you feel better, using itNo, I feel nothing in relation to it. It's not a word I invented, it's a word you invented. You as the human, as the representative of society, of the humanity of it all, of science and psychology. It's your word, and I'm attempting to use it to communicate with you. I gain or lose nothing by it because you're not a trained psychologist.
>less rejectedI literally don't understand the concept. People around me have felt fear at the concept of rejection, but I've never met someone I couldn't outpace in an argument. To *actually* oppress me, someone would have to justify their behavior, at which point I can just ask them "why?" and it all falls apart. Most forms of violence revolve around the attacked person attacking back, and most forms of escalation are misunderstandings on an emotional level that push people to go from talking to violence.
You're using your experience to try to map me into a box you understand. That's wrong. That's fundamentally not how to deal with a psychopath. We are known to be able to manipulate psychologists—trained, intelligent psychologists. Experts in their field. This is because they don't actually perceive us, they don't actually empathize with us. They, like you, make assumptions about our "personality," and it doesn't work, because, quite frankly.
Someone without a personality can be anyone.
