>>10540630>So the population is growing. Right?Obviously.
>This isn't really that hard.That's a strawman, but not entirely inaccurate.
>And let us stop now calling living beings "resources".I didn't.
>clear the muddy waters of what you try to pass off I think you're mixing me up with the imaginary strawman you've built yourself in your own mind.
>"totally sustainable resource consumption"I don't know who you're quoting, but it's not me.
>literally murderAHHHH, now we get to the meat of the issue.
You're a vegan?
>You are straining life from this world for your own selfish desires.Close enough.
Look sunshine. People eat animals. You might count that as "murder", but even then it's figurative murder, not literal. Please stop figuratively murdering the English language.
And if I understand your concerns, they don't seem to rest on population size or growth.
If I was the only human on Earth, and I ate hamburger, wouldn't I still be "straining life from this world for your own selfish desires"?
And what about other predators? Are sharks bad too? Wolves?
>Which is more important:>1: The human species>2: Literally every single combined other species on planet Earthhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemmaWhich is more important:
1. Vegans sharing their opinions.
2. Ending all rape and murder.
Shouldn't be a difficult question.
