>>10418670>disregard for and violation of the rights of othersSo it depends on what the culture considers rights.
Adept psychopaths will just figure out how to get as close to the line as possible and be assholes "within the rules".
>occurring since the age of 15All children are amoral psychopaths until they are "properly" programmed.
It is natural for a person to put their own needs before the needs of another.
The definition seems to depend on an arbitrary list of instances where trading the needs of one for the needs of another is deemed an "unfair" trade.
The means by which the trade is made also matters.
Forcibly taking somebody's money is wrong but acquiring it through a deceptive, yet consensual, predatory loan is ok.
It also seems like the competency of the person being screwed matters. (Pick on somebody your own size)
Is psychology just a privatized legal system that is attempting to codify social norms into its diagnostic criteria?
