>>10315614Google around, there's plenty of people who have put together compilations of errors. At the very least it's bizarre and I don't really understand why they would want or need to do this, given that it does appear that we're capable of getting objects into orbit, and there is an object that can be seen which is said to be the ISS. So why the CGI?
The other thing I'll mention is what I've internally dubbed the "born yesterday" fallacy. Which is a lot like last thursdayism, and is the tendency of people to assume any one of a number of people "types" on the internet were manufactured and programmed yesterday to generate weird output for you to argue with, perplex over, and become upset about. The reality is I wasn't born yesterday. I was taught all this shit was a certain way and believed it, but there are a number of problems which simply cannot be ignored or explained away.
Look for those videos on youtube or something. I don't have a good source on hand that isn't controlled opposition meant to make it look foolish. There's everything from greenscreen issues where people don't have feet, to a guy wandering in the back without a face mesh (but having teeth etc). Weird stuff. Not legit.
