>>10298831Well, thus far most studies to date, suggest that intelligence is mostly related to genes, for example Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study
, as well as twin studies which you mentioned, no one has problems with ackowlaging this when speaking of induviduals, but why can't same logic be aplied to populations?There is genualy not much one can do to incrase he's/her IQ by significant margins.Most experts if not mentioning race, would claim that IQ is mostly tracable back to genes.
>>10298843Trait vise, as much for genes, they wouldn't seem too diferant from native peoples of country them came from, with few slight diferances however these diferances are huge, by human standarts (mostly speaking about IQ) for example Indian americans are amongs top earners in US and they have one of highest average IQ's out of all minorities living in US however their native populations are not even near as ''sucesfull'' as their american counterparts and this makes a lot of sence since only most sucesfull and ''well put'' of them are alowed to imigrate into US, onother example would be blacks in UK, who on some verbal tests do better than native brits, but again keep in mind that only most sucesfull of africans are alowed to imigrate in UK.
