>>10258725>OK? How does this respond to the fact that scientists and economists agree that climate change is a huge problemit wasnt meant to respond to that you shit stain. I fucking replied to the economic point, why in the name of fuck would you bring up something im not even talking about.
>Oh and you forgot that fossil fuels have been subsidized for over a century before green energy even existed.wow, who woulda thought to compare fossil fuels during the industrial revolution and 2 world wars to green energy leeches that dont turn a profit so they needed the subsidies to survive
>US has some of the highest emmissions per capitayeah, and china is twice as bad as us, and thats just in co2 emissions, not even talking about other pollution. I fail to see why we have any reason to change our ways until China does, if we do we're still letting the worst problem continue AND are cutting our legs of economically speaking.
>>In fact, the data suggests that fossil fuel production/consumption is the fastest and best way to lift a country out of poverty.>So the US is in poverty?literally just not understanding basic logic at all
>>10258728>Where did I ignore any points about utility?you ignored it by replying with death tolls, and not fucking mentioning utility in your post at all
its that obvious, why even ask.
>>10258737the highest efficiency on the market is 22%, thats from november of 2018, happy new year you faggots
so i can only assume none of those are marketable by virtue of being impractical to produce.
>>10258739>Why does efficiency even matter for renewables?what is heat and waste energy, and can i also ask about what byproducts making solar panels creates.
not to mention taking up ungodly amounts of space with panels is retarded when we could go with much smaller and better nuclear instead
