>>10155497>Wtf is "an aspect or feature"? What kind of vague definition is that?Really? You don't know what an aspect or "feature" is?
Ex:
A "feature" humans have is furless skin.
Weather affects every "aspect" of our lives.
Obviously the universe has some "dimension" otherwise it would be nothing, no? If it has no dimensionality, then it has no aspects or features, then there is literally nothing to talk about. I'm not talking about Cartesian coordinates or math. I'm talking about the principle of having "dimension", aka having a "feature" or "aspect" that is "definable" in the first place. You can't even define something that has no features or aspects. just as you can't define something that has no properties or attributes. You are literally describing imaginary made up bullshit at that point.
Hence, "time" does not exist because it has no aspects or features, no properties nor attributes. The same goes for space.
>>10155509>Also, just to let you know, when people speak of time as a dimension.Just to let you know when people speak of "time" other than to keep track of other arbitrary made up shit (like business hours and whatnot), they are over complicating a completely imaginary measurement.
>They're not using your definition of "an aspect or feature" whatever that meansYou're right, they're assuming that it actually exists and then they defineit in their own terms based on whatever mathmatical abstraction they come up with. Do you think I made up the "dimension of time" part? I'm not insane enough to believe that hogwash.
