>>10088388>That's cute, you're thinking of Space as in outer space.Non Sequitur, you still have not given a property of "inner space".
>It has no properties yet you can displace it? It must have a property then.You're displacing the EM and matter you fuckwit. "Space" is still fucking "filled space". You can't point somewhere and go "There's space, of itself by itself!". No such thing. There is "less em and matter", but no absolute voidance of such.
>We are measuring time. Y-You're measuring time? What are you measuring this "time" with? This phenomena that has no properties or attributes...what are you using to measure this non existent concept with?
>uhhh with time in seconds/picoseconds>so you're measuring it with itselfWell sorry, things don't define themselves with circular reasoning. Try again.
"It has a positive vector", Well what the fuck is an attribute of a "positive vector"? What does that mean in reality where you and I live?
>You can invent a measurement, go ahead, but if what you are measuring doesn't exist then either you'll get a false result (measuring something else) or a zero result.That is what I have repeatedly said the past 20+ posts about time and space you lint-headed clod. Do you know how to read?
>Also, Tesla's claim has not been backed up by any evidence since he made it.There's nothing to be backed up the burden of proof lies on you retards to come up with a property of "Space", which no one has done other than with imaginary bullshit. Extra ordinary claims require extra ordinary evidence. Point to me a "space" that is manipulatable, there is none. In your own words.
"You can invent a measurement, go ahead, but if what you are measuring doesn't exist then either you'll get a false result"
>>10088410No shit, the "something else doing something" isn't a measurement though.
