>>10073274>am already familiar with classical mechanics.Does this mean you've read something at the level of Taylor or just an intro book for "university" physics?
>Are the Feynman lectures on physics and their accompanying book of exercises a good place to start teaching myself?They are good for a second-hand look into topics. Feynman is an exceptional lecturer but these lectures are made to peak your interest and more for entertainment than pure learning. Textbooks on the respective subjects are better but you should at least see what Feynman has to say.
If you want a quick breakdown, classical mechanics: Kleppner&Kolenkow then Taylor (can be read in tandem), electrodynamics: Purcell then Griffiths (can be read in tandem), Thermodynamics: any university physics book then something like Shroeder or Kittel, Quantum Mechanics: Zettili, Shankar, or Townsend supplemented by Griffiths
This should keep you busy for a while.