>>10015790>https://www.skepticalscience.com/lindzen-choi-2011-party-like-2009.html> hurr durr a Psychologist , Cook, "debunks" the world's greatest atmospheric physicist
What does Cook say?
Flaw #1: Comparing Tropical Apples with Global Oranges
Yeah, except the tropics are the largest source of purported positive feedback via the hypothesized increase in water vapor in the upper troposphere.
Flaw #2: Assuming Short-Term Local Feedbacks are Representative of Long-Term Global Feedbacks and Cherrypicking Noisy Data
Translation: Even though we have no evidence for it, there's a giant Long-term feedback hiding there. Therefore climate change is true!
The rest Cook's of "rebuttal" has been addressed in the follow up paper:
Lindzen, R. S., & Choi, Y. S. (2011). On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 47(4), 377.