Current status Hidden site now up at http://ydt6jy2ng3s3xg2e.onion/

Threads by latest replies - Page 4

(6 replies)

worst subfield

No.10147516 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What is the worst phys/chem/bio subfield of all?
1 post omitted
(25 replies)
No.10147062 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I was just diagnosed with autism, fucking autism... Jesus fucking Christ I just wanna kill myself!

What to do now? Should I just end this misery already?
20 posts and 3 images omitted
(25 replies)

SI-Unit thread

No.10145705 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Today the CGPA voted for the redefinition of the kilogramm. Why is nobody talking about this?

>Current definition: The kilogram is the unit of mass; it is equal to the mass of the international prototype of the kilogram.
>2019 definition: The kilogram, symbol kg, is the SI unit of mass. It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the Planck constant h to be 6.62607015×10?34 when expressed in the unit J?s, which is equal to kg?m2?s?1, where the metre and the second are defined in terms of c and ??Cs.

Some sources:

About damn time, if you ask me. Using a prototype kilogram was a disgrace to every theoretical physicist.
20 posts and 4 images omitted
(28 replies)

I made a theory on how to make cheaper more efficient computers

No.10145950 ViewReplyOriginalReport
I really want better computers. My computer sucks, and I think this theorem speeds up the process.
Solve for everything and then use it as an ultimate modifier for equations.
If I'm right, and any of you have connections, Could you please help?
In conclusion I think, --/+/-- creates better processing power
23 posts and 1 image omitted
(178 replies)
No.10141054 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>taking exam, 30 seconds left
>last question is about efficiency of something
>calculate -5467% efficiency
173 posts and 53 images omitted
(66 replies)

/mg/ maths general: module edition

No.10143747 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
talk maths, formerly >>10129486
61 posts and 7 images omitted
(5 replies)

Double Bsc./Msc.

No.10147685 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Anyone done this?
(7 replies)
No.10146378 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Forgive me, holy Father:

The set of all square primes = \varnothing
The set of all quadrilateral triangles = \varnothing
The set of sets that contain their selves = \varnothing

If any set A that contains itself (A) = \varnothing
then A = \varnothing and A \in A

If A \in A, and A = \varnothing
then \varnothing \in \varnothing

If \varnothing \in \varnothing
then {\varnothing} = {\varnothing , {varnothing}}

If {\varnothing} = 0 = {\varnothing , {varnothing}}
and {\varnothing , {varnothing}} = 1
then 0 = 1

If {\varnothing} = 0 = 1 = \varnothing
and {\varnothing , {varnothing}} = 1
and {\varnothing , {varnothing} . {\varnothing , {varnothing}}} = 2
then 1 = 2

>mfw all numbers are equal
2 posts omitted
(5 replies)

Microbiology general /micro/

No.10147708 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Haven't had one in a while
>Any research updates?
>surprise new antibiotic resistant Samonella outbreak in the US
(5 replies)
No.10147742 ViewReplyOriginalReport
ITT: counterexamples to the PHENOTYPE