>>10671253>Seriously though global warming is a death cult.Define "death cult". Because I'm pretty sure it's nowhere close.
>It's unfalsifiableNo it isn't. If the planet wasn't warming then it would be falsified. If CO2 turns out to not be a greenhouse gas it would be falsified. If there are other forcings which dominate humanity's contribution then it would be falsified.
>it requires you to give your resources to superiors to be savedIt requires taking resources AWAY form our "superiors". What do you think the impact of tax-and-dividend policies would be?
>it can only be understood by a white-robed priest classNonsense. It can be understood by anyone with a decent level of education, who is willing to put a moderate level of effort in. There's mountains of data and detailed explanations available on websites. The basics are accessible to high-school students.
If you don't understand AGW then that's on you.
>anyone who questions it just hasn't seen the light of the gospel. You're in a thread full of people making obviously bad-faith arguments against AGW, you're personally in the middle of comparing it to a cult, and yet you can't understand why people won't accept criticism of it with a simile?
>Have any of you killed for this yet? Would you, if mighty Climate said that you had to to avoid His wrath?Is this really the best you can do?
