An appeal to nature is a fallacy, not a valid explanation for something. "We should do X because humans naturally do it" is fucking stupid. Should we live in mud huts because humans naturally do that? Lets all burn down the cities because humans naturally lived in small hunter gatherer tribes for millions of years before we invented agriculture. How about we go back to murdering the children of rival tribes because thats what early humans did. Lets all go shit in the fucking woods and eat uncooked raw meat because thats what humans naturally did before we invented fire.>despite being common knowledge
Humans being pedophillic is not common knowledge. Common acording to whom and common among what fucking group?>are to explain your reasoning that's not on par with 'Think of the children'?
My reasoning is that appeal to nature is retarded and holds no weight. Even if my sole reason was "think of the children" I can easily put some actual fucking weight behind that. Children can be and often are traumatized by sex. Children develop unhealthy habits and destructive lifestyles when sexualized before they can comprehend sex. From damn near any perspective I can justify the concept that we shouldn't traumatize children. Economically it doesn't make sense because a traumatized population is inefficient and doesn't take economic risks. From a national defense perspective it makes sense because traumatized people are less likely to go to war or be willing to enlist, meaning the only way to maintain a military is forced enlistment. From an ethical perspective it is bad to inflict emotional harm on people, as well as the fact that because children have underdeveloped frontal lobes they can't properly make decisions to the same degree as an adult thus meaning they cannot consent.
You have no arguments. Fucking children is bad and you have no way to defend it. Not only do you have no way to defend pedophillia but you likely have no actual criticism of futa either.