>>3871000I'd describe attraction to children as being an issue, personally. The fairly common cocktail of mental illness and attraction toward children has led to some pretty heinous shit that really has no place in modern society
>>3871006I guess using minor isn't getting my thoughts across accurately. As teens get older there is definitely a blurring of the line, but I specifically mean underdeveloped bodies. Prepubescent bodies and the bodies of those who "look 15." I wouldn't call someone being attracted to
>>3868969 a pedo if it was purely physical attraction as, like they mention, her body looks adult. In that case, issue would arise with someone being attracted to the ability to manipulate her easier due to her age - but purely physical attraction to an adult body shouldn't constitute pedophilia. Something like
>>3869548 is where I would take issue. It's clearly supposed to depict the body of someone quite young. I'm too /beg/ to really pinpoint why she looks so juvenile to me, but what sticks out the most is the distinctive childlike clothing mixed with the small stature and pudginess. It's not for me to decide that she's not mentally 54 years old, but to depict and be attracted to someone who deliberately looks so young is where I see issue. And if anyone replies, please don't just mention that some adult women can look underage and leave it as if that's your all-powerful trump card. Let's have a conversation