>>3672374im jimmy tho
>>3672382>Nice strawman. the only part of that that was a strawman was the first sentence, and that's just making assumptions about (you) based on A: the dang demographic of this site, and B: the things you care about.
>"everyone who disagrees with feminist ideology is an autistic incel that doesnt get laid and advocates for trans people to be murdered xD"This is a straight up strawman fallacy. Do you do this shit unironically? Are you knowingly disingenuous or is it the only way you know how to think?
Like honestly why does all your hysterical strawman shit involve all this made up persecution and whatever? You're fundamentally incapable of having a rational, good faith conversation. You just reflexively jump to REEEE YOU WANT TO MURDER ME like a belligerent fucking faggot. Like why don't you feel embarrassed?
>The example I gave is a guy who literally just SHARED an article critical of metooWell A: idk who the fuck you're talking about. And B: Some dude getting shitcanned for SHARING some blog or whatever that is critical of rape victims isn't some fucking cultural crisis. If your employer thinks you're making them look bad they can fire you.
Like what exactly do you want? How do you fix this crisis of yours? Unions? An employee bill of rights? How do you resolve your dilemma when you hate "leftism?"
>No spastic woman hating, no foul language, just a shared fucking post.NO JUSTICE NO PEACE! UNIONIZE NOW!
>Do you think it's fair to deem that so offensive that he should be sacked for it?AGAIN: fairness isn't an actual metric of anything. You're talking about corporate TOS and employer standards and contract law and stuff.
Seriously stop obsessing about this "fairness" meme. You sound like a fucking 5 year old communist with that shit.
You are going to die. Humanity is eventually going to go extinct. There is no afterlife. Existence is fundamentally without intrinsic meaning. none of it is "fair."
