>>3604116no i'm actually a visual artist, insured, doing shows, working on pieces. i'm lurking on /ic/, because it is the only board that features a broad mix of international anons, the occasional "inspiration" threads with trad art (which i find extremely awesome at times) and the rare case if interesting art discussions.
i know what it means to work conceptually, as i've done it myself many a times and i'm also seeing several dozens of museum shows and gallery openings a year. i know my shit, and if you don't realize that i do, than you aren't on my level, buddy.
i challenge the execution of your concepts and you actually - hilariously - choose to go all "tl;dr" on it now. i don't think you realize what a chance people are giving you on here. you say it yourself, you have gotten some pretty good advice
>>3604113 that you initially brushed off as "being bad intentionally". some of those pieces of advice came directly from me, ratman (how i call you). i've been both nice to you (when i told you to learn how to photograph your art, improve your backgrounds, start experimenting with washes and so on) and being harsh, because you constantly keep doing your "on purpose" and drama-queen schtick to justify shit.
so, at the end of the day, you can call yourself lucky that there are anons like me out there who take part of your autistic "race" seriously, empathically, and chose to give you good advice. i have plenty of experience with exhibiting, i have learned most of the classic art production methods (etching, litho, spraying, screenprint, oils, charcoal and a bunch of others). i do think i know what i'm talking about and your way of dismissing comments and advice with good intentions is just plain ignorant.
>inb4 post your workas i've said a few threads ago, i won't let it happen that my works can be backtraced to some shit thread in /ic/. services like idqb are going to drastically improve and that can be career damaging. yes, i have ambitions.
