>>3588086you are a 100 percent that annoying kid that talks back endlessly in highschool and gives everyone around him a massive cluster headache.
Your entry-level attempts at a philosophical background for your project makes me shudder. Don't throw around "Fibonacci numbers" mystery tags in hope to somehow elevate the crap you are working on. It isn't working. Neither has your "wabi sabi" anything to do with what you paint. Nothing about your project is in any way subversive. If anything, it is naively affirming celebtrity culture.
If you want radical ugliness, go look at George Condo. If you want lethargic portraits of celebrities, look at Elisabeth Payton. But none of the shit you keep talking about in theory actually shows in any of your memes.
In school, you'd be told that you've "missed the subject". If your obsessions shows anything, it is that, somehow, you can get up to 170 paintings and make as little artistic progress in terms of technique as anyone could ever imagine. It is raving dilettantism. With George Condo, you see an artist that has diligently worked on finding that tangent area where ugliness meets a strange feeling of appeal that lingers. You have not reached any such threshold, as your paintings are lazy, unmotivated, calculated and done in a careless hurry. You take the vast current of celebrity photo grimaces that is flooding the internet everyday, which could be interesting, but you turn it into a file clerk endeavour with no soul. You take pride in all the obvious flaws and you justify them a posteriori, as if they were intended.
No criticism actually reaches you and you keep admitting that you ignore it or "didn't even read", again with the pride of a fool. You don't come here to have people actually discuss your project, you are much more like a 4yr old that keeps asking the same questions in a defiant phase and you have no interest in the answers you get. You ask for the sake of asking, you annoy for the sake of triggering people.
